I recently had two interesting experiences engaging with people concerning the environment and both made me think
about how the way we use language impacts how we act in the world.
In the first instance I had reason to call the Department of
Forests, Fish and Wildlife and upon doing so was directed to an automated call
response giving me a number of options to choose from. One of which was to
press a certain number if I was calling regarding nuisance animals. The term nuisance
animals caught my attention. “I wonder what they are referring to.” I
thought aloud to my children after I hung up the phone. My kids and I had a
disturbed chuckle—“Nuisance animals” we all wondered “is this the hotline
number for the seven plus billion homo sapiens whose habits and lifestyles are
grossly impacting planet earth at an unprecedented rate-- or is it referring to
the occasional raccoon who might visit those black and green bins whose covers
have not been bungee corded closed or crows who take aim at car windshields and
caw at inconvenient times?“
And how much of a stretch is it then to consider other
people as nuisance people, or other cultures as nuisance cultures? We see
elements of this playing out across the world stage with the ego-maniacal US
presidential candidate Donald Trump sharing his unfortunate worldview and the
unwieldy power his language utilization bears on US citizens.
The current state of the world we live in has come about in
no small part due to our utilizing language in the ways we do. How we
collectively think and act regarding the natural world is rooted in large part in the
worldview that humans are the most intelligent and enlightened species of the
animal kingdom and therefore of greater import. It also carries the notion
that humans are the species to whom Earth’s varied and tremendous riches have been
entrusted. Sounds rather arrogant when put this way but it is a worldview held
by a great many people the world over. This worldview has caused many of us to believe
that we are responsible to none other than ourselves and that Earth is here
for our taking. In actuality, we are only one of a vast multitude of species
who have a shared and deeply nuanced, temporary occupation of this planet we all
call home. The lofty view of ourselves as above other animals has allowed us to
continue to operate under thought and cultural value systems that see us as somehow removed from the natural world. We bend and bow to the
demands of a powerfully entrenched consumer culture. Business and economics
take precedence over the well being of the air, soil and waters upon which life
forms ultimately depend for their survival—the human species included. And to
what end?
The folly with which we have proceeded over the past two
hundred plus years since the industrial revolution saw the mechanization of labour
and mass production of goods has caused the undesirable effect of interrupting
the balance of life support systems in nature thereby causing the demise of
millions of other unspoken life forms along with it. We have been taught to
seek our happiness through mass consumption of products and lifestyles
dependent on imported, assembly line goods. Our worth is tied closely to our ability
to consume. We reinforce this with celebrations fueled and dependent upon our
shopping habits. Many people unquestioningly believe that we have improved our
lot—rising GDP, rising life expectancy, but with this too has come rising sea
levels and a warming planet, large scale destruction of long established areas
of incredible biodiversity such as rain forests and coral reefs and the rapid
growth of human poverty and a deepening sense of dis-connection and dis-ease.
Another recent encounter had me quite troubled by
the language used when a relatively small area of wet land supporting cattails,
spring peepers and a variety of other wetland species was referred to as“inconsequential” in terms of biological significance. Do
the spring peepers feel inconsequential when they sing their little hearts out
each spring or do they simply feel alive like the rest of us?
Who knows? The short answer is that the language used in both instances is representative of a mindset which upholds the norm that humans have the right to decide the fate of the natural world. Imagine if we applied the precautionary principle towards land development? Would biodiversity be more respected? Would we only develop what we truly need?
Who knows? The short answer is that the language used in both instances is representative of a mindset which upholds the norm that humans have the right to decide the fate of the natural world. Imagine if we applied the precautionary principle towards land development? Would biodiversity be more respected? Would we only develop what we truly need?
In the web of life,
nothing, and I mean NOTHING is inconsequential. The supreme hubris of humankind
combined with a glaring lack of awareness of the inter-connectedness of all
things has led to everything from whales washing ashore with stomachs full of
car parts and plastic as well as a dearth of human health problems from overuse
of antibiotics and other pharmaceuticals to a food system which has swung so
far from wholesome, local and in season that we forget how our ancestors ate. The sad tale is a long one.
Every choice we make in our patterns of consumption at the grocery store,
market, at the block store, drug store, hardware store, craft store, furniture,
and toy and clothing stores has an effect on everything. Every single product
we use in our daily lives came from somewhere and is going somewhere. There is
no magical away for the toxins we utilize. They bio-accumulate in our bodies,
and contaminate the soil, air and waters of the earth.
The good news is that Earth is an incredibly resilient
planet and given time can heal the wounds we have inflicted upon it. But the
timeline to heal may be a very long one and far, far too much diversity of life
may continue to be lost in the interim. It is high time we reconsider what we
truly require for a happy and meaningful life and consider the ways that our
current lifestyles are negatively impacting the natural world. The beauty of nature whispers to us. Our job is to become better and more responsive listeners.
Consider signing the Leap Manifesto
please click link below to listen
Postdoc Blues
Consider signing the Leap Manifesto
please click link below to listen
Postdoc Blues
True joyfulness cannot be commodifed.
Caring is free and urgently needed.
Mindfulness is a powerful action towards creating change with ease.
Caring is free and urgently needed.
Mindfulness is a powerful action towards creating change with ease.
In hope,
Jill
Jill this is beautiful. Thank you for these reminders that I very much need periodically and that I like to share with others. The Leap Manifesto is a great tool for change and I hope that many people sign it!
ReplyDeleteThank you again